AIFeb 12, 2025

ACCESS : A Benchmark for Abstract Causal Event Discovery and Reasoning

arXiv:2502.08148v112 citationsh-index: 44NAACL
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This work addresses the challenge of causal reasoning in NLP, particularly in out-of-distribution settings, which is a problem for researchers and developers of language models and AI systems.

The authors tackled the problem of identifying cause-and-effect relationships in NLP by introducing a new benchmark called ACCESS, which focuses on causality of everyday life events on the abstraction level, and demonstrated its potential to enhance QA reasoning performance in LLMs. The benchmark contains 1,400 causal pairs extracted from a large-scale dataset.

Identifying cause-and-effect relationships is critical to understanding real-world dynamics and ultimately causal reasoning. Existing methods for identifying event causality in NLP, including those based on Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit difficulties in out-of-distribution settings due to the limited scale and heavy reliance on lexical cues within available benchmarks. Modern benchmarks, inspired by probabilistic causal inference, have attempted to construct causal graphs of events as a robust representation of causal knowledge, where \texttt{CRAB} \citep{romanou2023crab} is one such recent benchmark along this line. In this paper, we introduce \texttt{ACCESS}, a benchmark designed for discovery and reasoning over abstract causal events. Unlike existing resources, \texttt{ACCESS} focuses on causality of everyday life events on the abstraction level. We propose a pipeline for identifying abstractions for event generalizations from \texttt{GLUCOSE} \citep{mostafazadeh-etal-2020-glucose}, a large-scale dataset of implicit commonsense causal knowledge, from which we subsequently extract $1,4$K causal pairs. Our experiments highlight the ongoing challenges of using statistical methods and/or LLMs for automatic abstraction identification and causal discovery in NLP. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that the abstract causal knowledge provided in \texttt{ACCESS} can be leveraged for enhancing QA reasoning performance in LLMs.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes