Healthcare cost prediction for heterogeneous patient profiles using deep learning models with administrative claims data
It addresses accurate and equitable cost predictions for healthcare payers and patients, particularly high-need individuals, but is incremental as it builds on existing deep learning methods with a novel segmentation approach.
This study tackled the problem of predicting healthcare costs for heterogeneous patient profiles using administrative claims data, proposing a channel-wise deep learning framework that reduced prediction errors by 23% and significantly lowered overpayments and underpayments, with greater bias reduction for high-need patients.
Problem: How can we design patient cost prediction models that effectively address the challenges of heterogeneity in administrative claims (AC) data to ensure accurate, fair, and generalizable predictions, especially for high-need (HN) patients with complex chronic conditions? Relevance: Accurate and equitable patient cost predictions are vital for developing health management policies and optimizing resource allocation, which can lead to significant cost savings for healthcare payers, including government agencies and private insurers. Addressing disparities in prediction outcomes for HN patients ensures better economic and clinical decision-making, benefiting both patients and payers. Methodology: This study is grounded in socio-technical considerations that emphasize the interplay between technical systems (e.g., deep learning models) and humanistic outcomes (e.g., fairness in healthcare decisions). It incorporates representation learning and entropy measurement to address heterogeneity and complexity in data and patient profiles, particularly for HN patients. We propose a channel-wise deep learning framework that mitigates data heterogeneity by segmenting AC data into separate channels based on types of codes (e.g., diagnosis, procedures) and costs. This approach is paired with a flexible evaluation design that uses multi-channel entropy measurement to assess patient heterogeneity. Results: The proposed channel-wise models reduce prediction errors by 23% compared to single-channel models, leading to 16.4% and 19.3% reductions in overpayments and underpayments, respectively. Notably, the reduction in prediction bias is significantly higher for HN patients, demonstrating effectiveness in handling heterogeneity and complexity in data and patient profiles. This demonstrates the potential for applying channel-wise modeling to domains with similar heterogeneity challenges.