Societal Alignment Frameworks Can Improve LLM Alignment
This work addresses the problem of improving LLM alignment for developers and users by offering a conceptual shift, though it is incremental as it builds on existing frameworks without presenting new empirical results.
The paper tackles the challenge of aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values by proposing the integration of societal alignment frameworks, such as social, economic, and contractual alignment, to address misspecified objectives and uncertainty, and suggests participatory interface designs as an alternative approach.
Recent progress in large language models (LLMs) has focused on producing responses that meet human expectations and align with shared values - a process coined alignment. However, aligning LLMs remains challenging due to the inherent disconnect between the complexity of human values and the narrow nature of the technological approaches designed to address them. Current alignment methods often lead to misspecified objectives, reflecting the broader issue of incomplete contracts, the impracticality of specifying a contract between a model developer, and the model that accounts for every scenario in LLM alignment. In this paper, we argue that improving LLM alignment requires incorporating insights from societal alignment frameworks, including social, economic, and contractual alignment, and discuss potential solutions drawn from these domains. Given the role of uncertainty within societal alignment frameworks, we then investigate how it manifests in LLM alignment. We end our discussion by offering an alternative view on LLM alignment, framing the underspecified nature of its objectives as an opportunity rather than perfect their specification. Beyond technical improvements in LLM alignment, we discuss the need for participatory alignment interface designs.