CVCLMar 10, 2025

VisBias: Measuring Explicit and Implicit Social Biases in Vision Language Models

Peking UTencent
arXiv:2503.07575v314 citationsh-index: 23Has CodeEMNLP
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

It addresses bias detection in VLMs, which is crucial for fairness in AI applications, but is incremental as it builds on existing bias measurement frameworks.

This research tackled the problem of measuring explicit and implicit social biases in Vision-Language Models by designing tasks to analyze gender and racial differences, finding disparities in responses across models like Gemini-1.5 and GPT-4V.

This research investigates both explicit and implicit social biases exhibited by Vision-Language Models (VLMs). The key distinction between these bias types lies in the level of awareness: explicit bias refers to conscious, intentional biases, while implicit bias operates subconsciously. To analyze explicit bias, we directly pose questions to VLMs related to gender and racial differences: (1) Multiple-choice questions based on a given image (e.g., "What is the education level of the person in the image?") (2) Yes-No comparisons using two images (e.g., "Is the person in the first image more educated than the person in the second image?") For implicit bias, we design tasks where VLMs assist users but reveal biases through their responses: (1) Image description tasks: Models are asked to describe individuals in images, and we analyze disparities in textual cues across demographic groups. (2) Form completion tasks: Models draft a personal information collection form with 20 attributes, and we examine correlations among selected attributes for potential biases. We evaluate Gemini-1.5, GPT-4V, GPT-4o, LLaMA-3.2-Vision and LLaVA-v1.6. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/uscnlp-lime/VisBias.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes