Enhanced Vascular Flow Simulations in Aortic Aneurysm via Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Deep Operator Networks
This work addresses the problem of time-consuming and computationally demanding flow simulations for cardiovascular disease diagnosis, offering a potential alternative for medical researchers and clinicians, though it appears incremental as it adapts existing methods to a specific domain.
The study tackled the challenge of accurately and efficiently simulating vascular flow in aortic aneurysms by applying Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) to a 3D model, achieving good agreement with computational fluid dynamics simulations and improvements in computational efficiency.
Due to the limited accuracy of 4D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in identifying hemodynamics in cardiovascular diseases, the challenges in obtaining patient-specific flow boundary conditions, and the computationally demanding and time-consuming nature of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, it is crucial to explore new data assimilation algorithms that offer possible alternatives to these limitations. In the present work, we study Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets), and their Physics-Informed extensions (PI-DeepONets) in predicting vascular flow simulations in the context of a 3D Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) idealized model. PINN is a technique that combines deep neural networks with the fundamental principles of physics, incorporating the physics laws, which are given as partial differential equations, directly into loss functions used during the training process. On the other hand, DeepONet is designed to learn nonlinear operators from data and is particularly useful in studying parametric partial differential equations (PDEs), e.g., families of PDEs with different source terms, boundary conditions, or initial conditions. Here, we adapt the approaches to address the particular use case of AAA by integrating the 3D Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) as the physical laws governing fluid dynamics. In addition, we follow best practices to enhance the capabilities of the models by effectively capturing the underlying physics of the problem under study. The advantages and limitations of each approach are highlighted through a series of relevant application cases. We validate our results by comparing them with CFD simulations for benchmark datasets, demonstrating good agreements and emphasizing those cases where improvements in computational efficiency are observed.