IceBench: A Benchmark for Deep Learning based Sea Ice Type Classification
This work addresses the problem of inconsistent evaluation in sea ice classification for climate and maritime researchers, but it is incremental as it builds on existing datasets and methods.
The authors tackled the lack of a standardized benchmark for deep learning-based sea ice type classification by introducing IceBench, a comprehensive framework that uses an existing dataset and includes representative models, resulting in systematic experiments on model transferability and preprocessing strategies.
Sea ice plays a critical role in the global climate system and maritime operations, making timely and accurate classification essential. However, traditional manual methods are time-consuming, costly, and have inherent biases. Automating sea ice type classification addresses these challenges by enabling faster, more consistent, and scalable analysis. While both traditional and deep learning approaches have been explored, deep learning models offer a promising direction for improving efficiency and consistency in sea ice classification. However, the absence of a standardized benchmark and comparative study prevents a clear consensus on the best-performing models. To bridge this gap, we introduce \textit{IceBench}, a comprehensive benchmarking framework for sea ice type classification. Our key contributions are threefold: First, we establish the IceBench benchmarking framework which leverages the existing AI4Arctic Sea Ice Challenge dataset as a standardized dataset, incorporates a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, and includes representative models from the entire spectrum of sea ice type classification methods categorized in two distinct groups, namely, pixel-based classification methods and patch-based classification methods. IceBench is open-source and allows for convenient integration and evaluation of other sea ice type classification methods; hence, facilitating comparative evaluation of new methods and improving reproducibility in the field. Second, we conduct an in-depth comparative study on representative models to assess their strengths and limitations, providing insights for both practitioners and researchers. Third, we leverage IceBench for systematic experiments addressing key research questions on model transferability across seasons (time) and locations (space), data downscaling, and preprocessing strategies.