Unpaired Translation of Chest X-ray Images for Lung Opacity Diagnosis via Adaptive Activation Masks and Cross-Domain Alignment
This addresses the challenge of accurate diagnosis in clinical settings by enhancing image clarity for radiologists, though it is incremental as it builds on existing translation techniques.
The study tackled the problem of lung opacities in chest X-ray images obscuring anatomical structures by proposing an unpaired translation framework that converts images with opacities into clear counterparts, resulting in improved segmentation accuracy (e.g., mIoU increased from 62.58% to 76.58% on RSNA) and lesion classification.
Chest X-ray radiographs (CXRs) play a pivotal role in diagnosing and monitoring cardiopulmonary diseases. However, lung opacities in CXRs frequently obscure anatomical structures, impeding clear identification of lung borders and complicating the localization of pathology. This challenge significantly hampers segmentation accuracy and precise lesion identification, which are crucial for diagnosis. To tackle these issues, our study proposes an unpaired CXR translation framework that converts CXRs with lung opacities into counterparts without lung opacities while preserving semantic features. Central to our approach is the use of adaptive activation masks to selectively modify opacity regions in lung CXRs. Cross-domain alignment ensures translated CXRs without opacity issues align with feature maps and prediction labels from a pre-trained CXR lesion classifier, facilitating the interpretability of the translation process. We validate our method using RSNA, MIMIC-CXR-JPG and JSRT datasets, demonstrating superior translation quality through lower Frechet Inception Distance (FID) and Kernel Inception Distance (KID) scores compared to existing methods (FID: 67.18 vs. 210.4, KID: 0.01604 vs. 0.225). Evaluation on RSNA opacity, MIMIC acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patient CXRs and JSRT CXRs show our method enhances segmentation accuracy of lung borders and improves lesion classification, further underscoring its potential in clinical settings (RSNA: mIoU: 76.58% vs. 62.58%, Sensitivity: 85.58% vs. 77.03%; MIMIC ARDS: mIoU: 86.20% vs. 72.07%, Sensitivity: 92.68% vs. 86.85%; JSRT: mIoU: 91.08% vs. 85.6%, Sensitivity: 97.62% vs. 95.04%). Our approach advances CXR imaging analysis, especially in investigating segmentation impacts through image translation techniques.