Regression-Based Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Selection Bias and Confounding
This work addresses a key challenge in causal inference for researchers dealing with biased observational data, though it builds incrementally on prior methods.
The paper tackles the problem of estimating causal effects when data suffers from both selection bias and confounding, proposing a two-step regression estimator that uses proxy variables to adjust for these issues. Simulation studies validate its correctness in scenarios with both biases.
We consider the problem of estimating the expected causal effect $E[Y|do(X)]$ for a target variable $Y$ when treatment $X$ is set by intervention, focusing on continuous random variables. In settings without selection bias or confounding, $E[Y|do(X)] = E[Y|X]$, which can be estimated using standard regression methods. However, regression fails when systematic missingness induced by selection bias, or confounding distorts the data. Boeken et al. [2023] show that when training data is subject to selection, proxy variables unaffected by this process can, under certain constraints, be used to correct for selection bias to estimate $E[Y|X]$, and hence $E[Y|do(X)]$, reliably. When data is additionally affected by confounding, however, this equality is no longer valid. Building on these results, we consider a more general setting and propose a framework that incorporates both selection bias and confounding. Specifically, we derive theoretical conditions ensuring identifiability and recoverability of causal effects under access to external data and proxy variables. We further introduce a two-step regression estimator (TSR), capable of exploiting proxy variables to adjust for selection bias while accounting for confounding. We show that TSR coincides with prior work if confounding is absent, but achieves a lower variance. Extensive simulation studies validate TSR's correctness for scenarios which may include both selection bias and confounding with proxy variables.