BOOST: Bootstrapping Strategy-Driven Reasoning Programs for Program-Guided Fact-Checking
This addresses the need for efficient, interpretable fact-checking pipelines by reducing human effort, though it is incremental in automating an existing program-guided approach.
The paper tackles the problem of automating fact-checking by generating reasoning programs without manual demonstrations, achieving superior performance over prior few-shot baselines in both zero-shot and few-shot settings for complex claim verification.
Large language model pipelines have improved automated fact-checking for complex claims, yet many approaches rely on few-shot in-context learning with demonstrations that require substantial human effort and domain expertise. Among these, program-guided reasoning, by decomposing claims into function calls and executing reasoning programs, which has shown particular promise, but remains limited by the need for manually crafted demonstrations. Fundamentally, the underlying principles of effective reasoning program generation still remain underexplored. In this work, we introduce BOOST, a bootstrapping approach for automated few-shot reasoning program generation. BOOST iteratively refines explicit, data-driven guidelines as meta-rules for guiding demonstration creation, using a critique-refine loop that eliminates the need for human intervention. This enables a seamless transition from zero-shot to few-shot program-guided learning, enhancing interpretability and effectiveness. Experimental results show that BOOST outperforms prior few-shot baselines in both zero-shot and few-shot settings for complex claim verification.