CCCLDSLOApr 6, 2025

Ineffectiveness for Search and Undecidability of PCSP Meta-Problems

arXiv:2504.04639v22 citationsh-index: 2FOCS
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses foundational theoretical computer science questions about the complexity and decidability of PCSPs, with implications for algorithm design and classification in constraint satisfaction.

The paper tackles the problem of whether search and decision versions of promise constraint satisfaction problems (PCSPs) are equivalent, proving that rounding solutions from known algorithms like BLP, AIP, and BLP+AIP to a search certificate can be as hard as any problem in TFNP, making these algorithms ineffective for search. It also shows that families of templates solvable via these algorithms and meta-problems related to cyclic polymorphisms and WNUs are undecidable.

It is an open question whether the search and decision versions of promise CSPs are equivalent. Most known algorithms for PCSPs solve only their \emph{decision} variant, and it is unknown whether they can be adapted to solve \emph{search} as well. The main approaches, called BLP, AIP and BLP+AIP, handle a PCSP by finding a solution to a relaxation of some integer program. We prove that rounding those solutions to a proper search certificate can be as hard as any problem in the class TFNP. In other words, these algorithms are ineffective for search. Building on the algebraic approach to PCSPs, we find sufficient conditions that imply ineffectiveness for search. Our tools are tailored to algorithms that are characterized by minions in a suitable way, and can also be used to prove undecidability results for meta-problems. This way, we show that the families of templates solvable via BLP, AIP, and BLP+AIP are undecidable. Using the same techniques we also analyze several algebraic conditions that are known to guarantee the tractability of finite-template CSPs. We prove that several meta-problems related to cyclic polymorphims and WNUs are undecidable for PCSPs. In particular, there is no algorithm deciding whether a finite PCSP template (1) admits cyclic a polymorphism, (2) admits a WNU.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes