CLAIApr 14, 2025

Can We Edit LLMs for Long-Tail Biomedical Knowledge?

arXiv:2504.10421v14 citationsh-index: 4Has CodeEMNLP
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses a domain-specific challenge for biomedical AI, but it is incremental as it highlights limitations rather than solving them.

The paper tackled the problem of editing large language models (LLMs) for long-tail biomedical knowledge, finding that existing methods improve performance but remain inferior to high-frequency knowledge, with a 0.15-0.25 performance gap in benchmarks.

Knowledge editing has emerged as an effective approach for updating large language models (LLMs) by modifying their internal knowledge. However, their application to the biomedical domain faces unique challenges due to the long-tailed distribution of biomedical knowledge, where rare and infrequent information is prevalent. In this paper, we conduct the first comprehensive study to investigate the effectiveness of knowledge editing methods for editing long-tail biomedical knowledge. Our results indicate that, while existing editing methods can enhance LLMs' performance on long-tail biomedical knowledge, their performance on long-tail knowledge remains inferior to that on high-frequency popular knowledge, even after editing. Our further analysis reveals that long-tail biomedical knowledge contains a significant amount of one-to-many knowledge, where one subject and relation link to multiple objects. This high prevalence of one-to-many knowledge limits the effectiveness of knowledge editing in improving LLMs' understanding of long-tail biomedical knowledge, highlighting the need for tailored strategies to bridge this performance gap.

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes