CRAIMay 10, 2025

System Prompt Poisoning: Persistent Attacks on Large Language Models Beyond User Injection

arXiv:2505.06493v317 citationsh-index: 12
Originality Highly original
AI Analysis

This addresses a critical security gap for developers and users of LLMs, revealing a new attack vector that is persistent and broad in impact, though it is incremental in building on existing threat models.

The paper tackles the security vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) by introducing system prompt poisoning, a persistent attack that poisons system prompts to affect all user interactions, and demonstrates its feasibility and effectiveness across various tasks, showing it weakens advanced techniques like chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented generation.

Large language models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across diverse applications due to their impressive generative capabilities. Their plug-and-play nature enables both developers and end users to interact with these models through simple prompts. However, as LLMs become more integrated into various systems in diverse domains, concerns around their security are growing. Existing studies mainly focus on threats arising from user prompts (e.g. prompt injection attack) and model output (e.g. model inversion attack), while the security of system prompts remains largely overlooked. This work bridges the critical gap. We introduce system prompt poisoning, a new attack vector against LLMs that, unlike traditional user prompt injection, poisons system prompts hence persistently impacts all subsequent user interactions and model responses. We systematically investigate four practical attack strategies in various poisoning scenarios. Through demonstration on both generative and reasoning LLMs, we show that system prompt poisoning is highly feasible without requiring jailbreak techniques, and effective across a wide range of tasks, including those in mathematics, coding, logical reasoning, and natural language processing. Importantly, our findings reveal that the attack remains effective even when user prompts employ advanced prompting techniques like chain-of-thought (CoT). We also show that such techniques, including CoT and retrieval-augmentation-generation (RAG), which are proven to be effective for improving LLM performance in a wide range of tasks, are significantly weakened in their effectiveness by system prompt poisoning.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes