AICLCVMay 9, 2025

Arrow-Guided VLM: Enhancing Flowchart Understanding via Arrow Direction Encoding

arXiv:2505.07864v15 citationsh-index: 2Has Code
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses a domain-specific issue for software design and business-process analysis by enhancing flowchart understanding, though it is incremental as it builds on existing VLM methods with a new pipeline.

The paper tackled the problem of vision-language models misinterpreting directional arrows and graph topology in flowcharts, achieving a 9 percentage point increase in overall accuracy from 80% to 89% on a benchmark without task-specific fine-tuning.

Flowcharts are indispensable tools in software design and business-process analysis, yet current vision-language models (VLMs) frequently misinterpret the directional arrows and graph topology that set these diagrams apart from natural images. We introduce a seven-stage pipeline grouped into three broader processes: (1) arrow-aware detection of nodes and arrow endpoints; (2) optical character recognition (OCR) to extract node text; and (3) construction of a structured prompt that guides the VLMs. Tested on a 90-question benchmark distilled from 30 annotated flowcharts, the method raises overall accuracy from 80 % to 89 % (+9 percentage points) without any task-specific fine-tuning. The gain is most pronounced for next-step queries (25/30 -> 30/30; 100 %, +17 pp); branch-result questions improve more modestly, and before-step questions remain difficult. A parallel evaluation with an LLM-as-a-Judge protocol shows the same trends, reinforcing the advantage of explicit arrow encoding. Limitations include dependence on detector and OCR precision, the small evaluation set, and residual errors at nodes with multiple incoming edges. Future work will enlarge the benchmark with synthetic and handwritten flowcharts and assess the approach on Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) and Unified Modeling Language (UML).

Code Implementations1 repo
Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes