AILGMay 20, 2025

Self-Evolving Curriculum for LLM Reasoning

MILA
arXiv:2505.14970v477 citationsh-index: 56
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the challenge of efficiently enhancing LLM reasoning for applications in mathematics and code generation, though it appears incremental as it builds on existing RL fine-tuning methods.

The paper tackles the problem of suboptimal training curricula in reinforcement learning fine-tuning for large language models by proposing Self-Evolving Curriculum (SEC), an automatic method that learns a curriculum policy concurrently with training, and it significantly improves reasoning capabilities and generalization across domains like planning, inductive reasoning, and mathematics.

Reinforcement learning (RL) has proven effective for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs), significantly enhancing their reasoning abilities in domains such as mathematics and code generation. A crucial factor influencing RL fine-tuning success is the training curriculum: the order in which training problems are presented. While random curricula serve as common baselines, they remain suboptimal; manually designed curricula often rely heavily on heuristics, and online filtering methods can be computationally prohibitive. To address these limitations, we propose Self-Evolving Curriculum (SEC), an automatic curriculum learning method that learns a curriculum policy concurrently with the RL fine-tuning process. Our approach formulates curriculum selection as a non-stationary Multi-Armed Bandit problem, treating each problem category (e.g., difficulty level or problem type) as an individual arm. We leverage the absolute advantage from policy gradient methods as a proxy measure for immediate learning gain. At each training step, the curriculum policy selects categories to maximize this reward signal and is updated using the TD(0) method. Across three distinct reasoning domains: planning, inductive reasoning, and mathematics, our experiments demonstrate that SEC significantly improves models' reasoning capabilities, enabling better generalization to harder, out-of-distribution test problems. Additionally, our approach achieves better skill balance when fine-tuning simultaneously on multiple reasoning domains. These findings highlight SEC as a promising strategy for RL fine-tuning of LLMs.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes