Turing Test 2.0: The General Intelligence Threshold
This addresses the challenge of defining and measuring AGI for researchers and developers in AI, but it appears incremental as it builds on existing concepts like the Turing test.
The paper tackles the problem of detecting artificial general intelligence (AGI) by arguing that traditional methods like the Turing test are insufficient and proposing a new framework called Turing Test 2.0, which includes a clear definition of general intelligence and a threshold for distinguishing AGI systems, with demonstrations on modern AI models.
With the rise of artificial intelligence (A.I.) and large language models like ChatGPT, a new race for achieving artificial general intelligence (A.G.I) has started. While many speculate how and when A.I. will achieve A.G.I., there is no clear agreement on how A.G.I. can be detected in A.I. models, even when popular tools like the Turing test (and its modern variations) are used to measure their intelligence. In this work, we discuss why traditional methods like the Turing test do not suffice for measuring or detecting A.G.I. and provide a new, practical method that can be used to decide if a system (computer or any other) has reached or surpassed A.G.I. To achieve this, we make two new contributions. First, we present a clear definition for general intelligence (G.I.) and set a G.I. Threshold (G.I.T.) that can be used to distinguish between systems that achieve A.G.I. and systems that do not. Second, we present a new framework on how to construct tests that can detect if a system has achieved G.I. in a simple, comprehensive, and clear-cut fail/pass way. We call this novel framework the Turing test 2.0. We then demonstrate real-life examples of applying tests that follow our Turing test 2.0 framework on modern A.I. models.