MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration
This addresses the issue of knowledge boundary awareness for users of multimodal large language models, though it appears incremental as it builds on prior confidence estimation methods.
The paper tackles the problem of multimodal reasoning in MLLMs by proposing MMBoundary, a framework that calibrates confidence at each reasoning step to reduce hallucination, resulting in a 7.5% average reduction in calibration errors and up to 8.3% improvement in task performance.
In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress but continue to face inherent challenges in multimodal reasoning, which requires multi-level (e.g., perception, reasoning) and multi-granular (e.g., multi-step reasoning chain) advanced inferencing. Prior work on estimating model confidence tends to focus on the overall response for training and calibration, but fails to assess confidence in each reasoning step, leading to undesirable hallucination snowballing. In this work, we present MMBoundary, a novel framework that advances the knowledge boundary awareness of MLLMs through reasoning step confidence calibration. To achieve this, we propose to incorporate complementary textual and cross-modal self-rewarding signals to estimate confidence at each step of the MLLM reasoning process. In addition to supervised fine-tuning MLLM on this set of self-rewarded confidence estimation signal for initial confidence expression warm-up, we introduce a reinforcement learning stage with multiple reward functions for further aligning model knowledge and calibrating confidence at each reasoning step, enhancing reasoning chain self-correction. Empirical results show that MMBoundary significantly outperforms existing methods across diverse domain datasets and metrics, achieving an average of 7.5% reduction in multimodal confidence calibration errors and up to 8.3% improvement in task performance.