Stop Guessing: Optimizing Goalkeeper Policies for Soccer Penalty Kicks
This work addresses the challenge of providing actionable advice to soccer practitioners by overcoming limitations in existing data analyses that assume independent actions between goalkeepers and takers.
The paper tackled the problem of optimizing goalkeeper strategies for soccer penalty kicks by developing a player-agnostic simulation framework that incorporates player skills and a rich set of choices, using a large annotated dataset to evaluate and optimize policies for real-world application.
Penalties are fraught and game-changing moments in soccer games that teams explicitly prepare for. Consequently, there has been substantial interest in analyzing them in order to provide advice to practitioners. From a data science perspective, such analyses suffer from a significant limitation: they make the unrealistic simplifying assumption that goalkeepers and takers select their action -- where to dive and where to the place the kick -- independently of each other. In reality, the choices that some goalkeepers make depend on the taker's movements and vice-versa. This adds substantial complexity to the problem because not all players have the same action capacities, that is, only some players are capable of basing their decisions on their opponent's movements. However, the small sample sizes on the player level mean that one may have limited insights into a specific opponent's capacities. We address these challenges by developing a player-agnostic simulation framework that can evaluate the efficacy of different goalkeeper strategies. It considers a rich set of choices and incorporates information about a goalkeeper's skills. Our work is grounded in a large dataset of penalties that were annotated by penalty experts and include aspects of both kicker and goalkeeper strategies. We show how our framework can be used to optimize goalkeeper policies in real-world situations.