Judicial Permission
arXiv:2506.04610v1h-index: 54ICAIL
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis
This work addresses a specific issue in legal reasoning and argumentation theory, representing an incremental contribution to the domain.
The paper tackles the problem of modeling weak permissions in criminal trials by introducing a dialogue game model that accounts for varying standards of proof and argumentation semantics, resulting in a formal framework for analyzing judicial permissions.
This paper examines the significance of weak permissions in criminal trials (\emph{judicial permission}). It introduces a dialogue game model to systematically address judicial permissions, considering different standards of proof and argumentation semantics.