SCOP: Evaluating the Comprehension Process of Large Language Models from a Cognitive View
This addresses the reliability of LLMs in real-world applications by highlighting gaps in their comprehension processes, though it is incremental as it builds on existing evaluation methods.
The paper tackles the problem of evaluating whether large language models (LLMs) comprehend text in a way aligned with human experts, proposing SCOP to assess five comprehension skills and finding that LLMs struggle with expert-level comprehension, sometimes reaching correct answers through flawed processes.
Despite the great potential of large language models(LLMs) in machine comprehension, it is still disturbing to fully count on them in real-world scenarios. This is probably because there is no rational explanation for whether the comprehension process of LLMs is aligned with that of experts. In this paper, we propose SCOP to carefully examine how LLMs perform during the comprehension process from a cognitive view. Specifically, it is equipped with a systematical definition of five requisite skills during the comprehension process, a strict framework to construct testing data for these skills, and a detailed analysis of advanced open-sourced and closed-sourced LLMs using the testing data. With SCOP, we find that it is still challenging for LLMs to perform an expert-level comprehension process. Even so, we notice that LLMs share some similarities with experts, e.g., performing better at comprehending local information than global information. Further analysis reveals that LLMs can be somewhat unreliable -- they might reach correct answers through flawed comprehension processes. Based on SCOP, we suggest that one direction for improving LLMs is to focus more on the comprehension process, ensuring all comprehension skills are thoroughly developed during training.