Wanting to Be Understood Explains the Meta-Problem of Consciousness
This addresses a foundational philosophical problem in consciousness studies, offering a psychological explanation rather than a metaphysical one, but it is incremental as it builds on existing theories without empirical validation.
The paper tackles the hard problem of consciousness by proposing that the drive to be understood explains why we find it unsatisfying to explain subjective experience, arguing that this inflated epistemic demand, not a metaphysical gap, keeps the problem alive, with the result that we will never stop creating new ways to communicate about experiences.
Because we are highly motivated to be understood, we created public external representations -- mime, language, art -- to externalise our inner states. We argue that such external representations are a pre-condition for access consciousness, the global availability of information for reasoning. Yet the bandwidth of access consciousness is tiny compared with the richness of `raw experience', so no external representation can reproduce that richness in full. Ordinarily an explanation of experience need only let an audience `grasp' the relevant pattern, not relive the phenomenon. But our drive to be understood, and our low level sensorimotor capacities for `grasping' so rich, that the demand for an explanation of the feel of experience cannot be ``satisfactory''. That inflated epistemic demand (the preeminence of our expectation that we could be perfectly understood by another or ourselves) rather than an irreducible metaphysical gulf -- keeps the hard problem of consciousness alive. But on the plus side, it seems we will simply never give up creating new ways to communicate and think about our experiences. In this view, to be consciously aware is to strive to have one's agency understood by oneself and others.