The Rise of AI Companions: Interaction with AI Companions and Psychological Well-being
For researchers and developers of AI chatbots, this study provides empirical evidence that AI companionship may negatively impact well-being, contingent on usage patterns and offline social networks.
This study examines the relationship between AI companionship and psychological well-being using self-reported data and chat histories from 1,131 CharacterAI users. It finds that using AI companions as a primary form of companionship is associated with lower well-being, especially when interactions are intensive and highly disclosive.
As large language model (LLM)-enhanced chatbots become increasingly expressive and socially responsive, many users begin forming companionship-like bonds with them. This study investigates how using AI companions relates to psychological well-being. We collected self-reported data from 1,131 U.S. adults who use CharacterAI, including survey responses and 4,664 chat sessions (464,687 messages) from 237 participants. By triangulating self-reported usage, relationship descriptions, and real chat histories, we identify patterns of engagement and associated outcomes. Smaller social networks were associated with reporting companionship as the primary chatbot use (beta = -0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.05, -0.01]), which in turn was associated with lower well-being (beta = -0.48, 95% CI [-0.70, -0.25]). For self-reported companionship usage, this association was stronger when interactions were intensive (beta = -0.31, 95% CI [-0.56, -0.06]) and highly disclosive (beta = -0.38, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.14]). These results suggest that the association between AI companionship and well-being is not uniform and depends on how chatbots are used and users' offline social environments.