LGJul 4, 2025

Absolute Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning: A Survey

arXiv:2507.03392v11 citationsh-index: 8
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

It addresses the lack of comprehensive guidance for practitioners in selecting appropriate metrics to compare models effectively across diverse applications.

This survey tackles the problem of varied evaluation approaches in machine learning by providing an overview of absolute evaluation measures, which assess model performance on a fixed scale to enable explicit comparisons across domains such as classification, clustering, regression, and ranking.

Machine Learning is a diverse field applied across various domains such as computer science, social sciences, medicine, chemistry, and finance. This diversity results in varied evaluation approaches, making it difficult to compare models effectively. Absolute evaluation measures offer a practical solution by assessing a model's performance on a fixed scale, independent of reference models and data ranges, enabling explicit comparisons. However, many commonly used measures are not universally applicable, leading to a lack of comprehensive guidance on their appropriate use. This survey addresses this gap by providing an overview of absolute evaluation metrics in ML, organized by the type of learning problem. While classification metrics have been extensively studied, this work also covers clustering, regression, and ranking metrics. By grouping these measures according to the specific ML challenges they address, this survey aims to equip practitioners with the tools necessary to select appropriate metrics for their models. The provided overview thus improves individual model evaluation and facilitates meaningful comparisons across different models and applications.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes