Gendered Divides in Online Discussions about Reproductive Rights
This reveals that abortion discourse is deeply structured by gender and place, highlighting identity's role in political expression during institutional disruption.
The study analyzed nearly 10 million abortion-related posts on X to show that gender significantly moderates abortion attitudes and emotional expression, particularly in conservative regions, creating a gender gap that grows more pronounced there, with the Dobbs draft opinion leak disproportionately mobilizing pro-abortion women in threatened areas.
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization marked a turning point in the national debate over reproductive rights. While the ideological divide over abortion is well documented, less is known about how gender and local sociopolitical contexts interact to shape public discourse. Drawing on nearly 10 million abortion-related posts on X (formerly Twitter) from users with inferred gender, ideology and location, we show that gender significantly moderates abortion attitudes and emotional expression, particularly in conservative regions, and independently of ideology. This creates a gender gap in abortion attitudes that grows more pronounced in conservative regions. The leak of the Dobbs draft opinion further intensified online engagement, disproportionately mobilizing pro-abortion women in areas where access was under threat. These findings reveal that abortion discourse is not only ideologically polarized but also deeply structured by gender and place, highlighting the central role of identity in shaping political expression during moments of institutional disruption.