Harnessing the Power of Interleaving and Counterfactual Evaluation for Airbnb Search Ranking
This addresses the problem of inefficient online evaluation for businesses with high-stakes purchases, offering a more rapid and sensitive method for selecting candidates for A/B tests, though it is incremental in improving existing evaluation techniques.
The paper tackled the challenge of slow and low-power A/B testing for ranking algorithms in online platforms like Airbnb by developing interleaving and counterfactual evaluation methods, resulting in up to 100 times increased sensitivity in experiments.
Evaluation plays a crucial role in the development of ranking algorithms on search and recommender systems. It enables online platforms to create user-friendly features that drive commercial success in a steady and effective manner. The online environment is particularly conducive to applying causal inference techniques, such as randomized controlled experiments (known as A/B test), which are often more challenging to implement in fields like medicine and public policy. However, businesses face unique challenges when it comes to effective A/B test. Specifically, achieving sufficient statistical power for conversion-based metrics can be time-consuming, especially for significant purchases like booking accommodations. While offline evaluations are quicker and more cost-effective, they often lack accuracy and are inadequate for selecting candidates for A/B test. To address these challenges, we developed interleaving and counterfactual evaluation methods to facilitate rapid online assessments for identifying the most promising candidates for A/B tests. Our approach not only increased the sensitivity of experiments by a factor of up to 100 (depending on the approach and metrics) compared to traditional A/B testing but also streamlined the experimental process. The practical insights gained from usage in production can also benefit organizations with similar interests.