Human-Robot Red Teaming for Safety-Aware Reasoning
This addresses safety and trust issues for human-robot teams in safety-critical domains, but it appears incremental as it builds on existing safety and collaboration concepts.
The paper tackles the problem of ensuring robots perform tasks safely in high-risk domains by proposing a human-robot red teaming paradigm, demonstrating that it enables safe planning and operation in environments like lunar habitats and households with varying safety definitions.
While much research explores improving robot capabilities, there is a deficit in researching how robots are expected to perform tasks safely, especially in high-risk problem domains. Robots must earn the trust of human operators in order to be effective collaborators in safety-critical tasks, specifically those where robots operate in human environments. We propose the human-robot red teaming paradigm for safety-aware reasoning. We expect humans and robots to work together to challenge assumptions about an environment and explore the space of hazards that may arise. This exploration will enable robots to perform safety-aware reasoning, specifically hazard identification, risk assessment, risk mitigation, and safety reporting. We demonstrate that: (a) human-robot red teaming allows human-robot teams to plan to perform tasks safely in a variety of domains, and (b) robots with different embodiments can learn to operate safely in two different environments -- a lunar habitat and a household -- with varying definitions of safety. Taken together, our work on human-robot red teaming for safety-aware reasoning demonstrates the feasibility of this approach for safely operating and promoting trust on human-robot teams in safety-critical problem domains.