HCCVAug 3, 2025

Implicit Search Intent Recognition using EEG and Eye Tracking: Novel Dataset and Cross-User Prediction

arXiv:2508.01860v110 citationsh-index: 7ICMI
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses a practical limitation in assistive technology for visual search tasks by enabling intent recognition without user-specific training data, though it is incremental in improving dataset realism and prediction flexibility.

The paper tackled the problem of distinguishing between navigational and informational search intents using EEG and eye-tracking data by introducing a novel dataset with user-determined search times and a cross-user prediction method, achieving 84.5% accuracy in cross-user evaluations, comparable to within-user accuracy of 85.5%.

For machines to effectively assist humans in challenging visual search tasks, they must differentiate whether a human is simply glancing into a scene (navigational intent) or searching for a target object (informational intent). Previous research proposed combining electroencephalography (EEG) and eye-tracking measurements to recognize such search intents implicitly, i.e., without explicit user input. However, the applicability of these approaches to real-world scenarios suffers from two key limitations. First, previous work used fixed search times in the informational intent condition -- a stark contrast to visual search, which naturally terminates when the target is found. Second, methods incorporating EEG measurements addressed prediction scenarios that require ground truth training data from the target user, which is impractical in many use cases. We address these limitations by making the first publicly available EEG and eye-tracking dataset for navigational vs. informational intent recognition, where the user determines search times. We present the first method for cross-user prediction of search intents from EEG and eye-tracking recordings and reach 84.5% accuracy in leave-one-user-out evaluations -- comparable to within-user prediction accuracy (85.5%) but offering much greater flexibility

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes