CLAug 4, 2025

Harnessing Temporal Databases for Systematic Evaluation of Factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering in Large Language Models

arXiv:2508.02045v11 citationsh-index: 28Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the need for better evaluation of LLMs on time-sensitive facts, which is crucial for applications requiring up-to-date knowledge, though it is incremental by complementing existing Wikipedia-based approaches.

The authors tackled the problem of evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) on time-sensitive factual question-answering by proposing TDBench, a benchmark that uses temporal databases to systematically generate question-answer pairs, enabling scalable and comprehensive evaluation while reducing human labor.

Facts evolve over time, making it essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to handle time-sensitive factual knowledge accurately and reliably. While factual Time-Sensitive Question-Answering (TSQA) tasks have been widely studied, existing benchmarks often rely on manual curation or a small, fixed set of predefined templates, which restricts scalable and comprehensive TSQA evaluation. To address these challenges, we propose TDBench, a new benchmark that systematically constructs TSQA pairs by harnessing temporal databases and database techniques such as temporal SQL and functional dependencies. We also introduce a fine-grained evaluation metric called time accuracy, which assesses the validity of time references in model explanations alongside traditional answer accuracy to enable a more reliable TSQA evaluation. Extensive experiments on contemporary LLMs show how \ours{} enables scalable and comprehensive TSQA evaluation while reducing the reliance on human labor, complementing existing Wikipedia/Wikidata-based TSQA evaluation approaches by enabling LLM evaluation on application-specific data and seamless multi-hop question generation. Code and data are publicly available at: https://github.com/ssoy0701/tdbench.git.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes