From Monolingual to Bilingual: Investigating Language Conditioning in Large Language Models for Psycholinguistic Tasks
This provides insights into using LLMs as models of cross-linguistic cognition, but it is incremental as it builds on existing psycholinguistic research.
The study investigated how large language models encode psycholinguistic knowledge across languages, finding that models adjust outputs based on prompted language identity, with Qwen showing greater sensitivity and Chinese prompts yielding stronger valence representations.
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong linguistic capabilities, but little is known about how they encode psycholinguistic knowledge across languages. We investigate whether and how LLMs exhibit human-like psycholinguistic responses under different linguistic identities using two tasks: sound symbolism and word valence. We evaluate two models, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct, under monolingual and bilingual prompting in English, Dutch, and Chinese. Behaviorally, both models adjust their outputs based on prompted language identity, with Qwen showing greater sensitivity and sharper distinctions between Dutch and Chinese. Probing analysis reveals that psycholinguistic signals become more decodable in deeper layers, with Chinese prompts yielding stronger and more stable valence representations than Dutch. Our results demonstrate that language identity conditions both output behavior and internal representations in LLMs, providing new insights into their application as models of cross-linguistic cognition.