LGMLAug 5, 2025

Achieving Limited Adaptivity for Multinomial Logistic Bandits

arXiv:2508.03072v11 citationsh-index: 2
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the need for practical, computationally efficient algorithms in real-world scenarios with multiple outcomes, though it is incremental as it builds on existing optimal regret methods.

The paper tackles the problem of multinomial logistic bandits by developing algorithms with limited adaptivity, specifically requiring only M policy updates, and achieves competitive or better performance than state-of-the-art baselines with O(√T) regret in stochastic and adversarial contexts.

Multinomial Logistic Bandits have recently attracted much attention due to their ability to model problems with multiple outcomes. In this setting, each decision is associated with many possible outcomes, modeled using a multinomial logit function. Several recent works on multinomial logistic bandits have simultaneously achieved optimal regret and computational efficiency. However, motivated by real-world challenges and practicality, there is a need to develop algorithms with limited adaptivity, wherein we are allowed only $M$ policy updates. To address these challenges, we present two algorithms, B-MNL-CB and RS-MNL, that operate in the batched and rarely-switching paradigms, respectively. The batched setting involves choosing the $M$ policy update rounds at the start of the algorithm, while the rarely-switching setting can choose these $M$ policy update rounds in an adaptive fashion. Our first algorithm, B-MNL-CB extends the notion of distributional optimal designs to the multinomial setting and achieves $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret assuming the contexts are generated stochastically when presented with $Ω(\log \log T)$ update rounds. Our second algorithm, RS-MNL works with adversarially generated contexts and can achieve $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret with $\tilde{O}(\log T)$ policy updates. Further, we conducted experiments that demonstrate that our algorithms (with a fixed number of policy updates) are extremely competitive (and often better) than several state-of-the-art baselines (which update their policy every round), showcasing the applicability of our algorithms in various practical scenarios.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes