LGAIAug 10, 2025

Causal Negative Sampling via Diffusion Model for Out-of-Distribution Recommendation

arXiv:2508.07243v12 citationsh-index: 13
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses robustness issues in recommendation systems under distribution shifts, offering a novel approach to mitigate biases, though it is incremental as it builds on existing negative sampling methods.

The paper tackles the problem of false hard negatives in heuristic negative sampling for recommendation systems, which arise from environmental confounders like exposure biases, and proposes CNSDiff to synthesize negative samples via diffusion models, achieving an average 13.96% improvement in OOD generalization metrics.

Heuristic negative sampling enhances recommendation performance by selecting negative samples of varying hardness levels from predefined candidate pools to guide the model toward learning more accurate decision boundaries. However, our empirical and theoretical analyses reveal that unobserved environmental confounders (e.g., exposure or popularity biases) in candidate pools may cause heuristic sampling methods to introduce false hard negatives (FHNS). These misleading samples can encourage the model to learn spurious correlations induced by such confounders, ultimately compromising its generalization ability under distribution shifts. To address this issue, we propose a novel method named Causal Negative Sampling via Diffusion (CNSDiff). By synthesizing negative samples in the latent space via a conditional diffusion process, CNSDiff avoids the bias introduced by predefined candidate pools and thus reduces the likelihood of generating FHNS. Moreover, it incorporates a causal regularization term to explicitly mitigate the influence of environmental confounders during the negative sampling process, leading to robust negatives that promote out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. Comprehensive experiments under four representative distribution shift scenarios demonstrate that CNSDiff achieves an average improvement of 13.96% across all evaluation metrics compared to state-of-the-art baselines, verifying its effectiveness and robustness in OOD recommendation tasks.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes