COLOMar 30

Additive systems for $\mathbb{Z}$ are undecidable

arXiv:2508.172858.6
Predicted impact top 85% in CO · last 90 daysOriginality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

For mathematicians and computer scientists, it proves that a natural combinatorial problem about integer representations is undecidable, linking it to long-standing open problems.

The paper shows that determining whether a canonical additive system covers all integers is undecidable, as it is equivalent to the Collatz conjecture and the universal halting problem for Fractran.

What are the collections of sets ${A}_i\subset\mathbb{Z}$ such that any $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ has exactly one representation as $n=a_0+a_1+\dotsb$ with $a_i\in{A}_i$? The answer for $\mathbb{N}_0$ instead of $\mathbb{Z}$ is given by a theorem of de Bruijn. We describe a family of natural candidate collections for $\mathbb{Z}$, which we call canonical collections. Translating the problem into the language of dynamical systems, we show that the question of whether the sumset of a canonical collection covers the entire $\mathbb{Z}$ is difficult: specifically, there is a collection for which this question is equivalent to the Collatz conjecture, and there is a well-behaved family of collections for which this question is equivalent to the universal halting problem for Fractran and is therefore undecidable.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes