ROAIAug 29, 2025

RoboInspector: Unveiling the Unreliability of Policy Code for LLM-enabled Robotic Manipulation

arXiv:2508.21378v1h-index: 8
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of unreliable robotic manipulation for users relying on LLM-generated code, though it is incremental as it builds on existing frameworks.

The paper tackles the unreliability of policy code generation by LLMs for robotic manipulation, identifying four main failure behaviors through experiments with 168 task-instruction-LLM combinations, and introduces a refinement approach that improves reliability by up to 35%.

Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in reasoning and code generation, enabling robotic manipulation to be initiated with just a single instruction. The LLM carries out various tasks by generating policy code required to control the robot. Despite advances in LLMs, achieving reliable policy code generation remains a significant challenge due to the diverse requirements of real-world tasks and the inherent complexity of user instructions. In practice, different users may provide distinct instructions to drive the robot for the same task, which may cause the unreliability of policy code generation. To bridge this gap, we design RoboInspector, a pipeline to unveil and characterize the unreliability of the policy code for LLM-enabled robotic manipulation from two perspectives: the complexity of the manipulation task and the granularity of the instruction. We perform comprehensive experiments with 168 distinct combinations of tasks, instructions, and LLMs in two prominent frameworks. The RoboInspector identifies four main unreliable behaviors that lead to manipulation failure. We provide a detailed characterization of these behaviors and their underlying causes, giving insight for practical development to reduce unreliability. Furthermore, we introduce a refinement approach guided by failure policy code feedback that improves the reliability of policy code generation by up to 35% in LLM-enabled robotic manipulation, evaluated in both simulation and real-world environments.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes