CLAISep 3, 2025

E-ARMOR: Edge case Assessment and Review of Multilingual Optical Character Recognition

Amazon
arXiv:2509.03615v11 citationsh-index: 10AIMLSystems
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of deploying efficient OCR systems in resource-constrained environments for multilingual applications, showing incremental improvements in benchmarking and edge-case analysis.

The paper tackled the challenge of multilingual OCR in noisy real-world images by evaluating state-of-the-art LVLMs and traditional systems, finding that traditional OCR like Sprinklr-Edge-OCR achieved the best overall F1 score (0.46) and efficiency, processing images 35 times faster at less than 0.01 of the cost compared to LVLMs.

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in multilingual, noisy, and diverse real-world images remains a significant challenge for optical character recognition systems. With the rise of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), there is growing interest in their ability to generalize and reason beyond fixed OCR pipelines. In this work, we introduce Sprinklr-Edge-OCR, a novel OCR system built specifically optimized for edge deployment in resource-constrained environments. We present a large-scale comparative evaluation of five state-of-the-art LVLMs (InternVL, Qwen, GOT OCR, LLaMA, MiniCPM) and two traditional OCR systems (Sprinklr-Edge-OCR, SuryaOCR) on a proprietary, doubly hand annotated dataset of multilingual (54 languages) images. Our benchmark covers a broad range of metrics including accuracy, semantic consistency, language coverage, computational efficiency (latency, memory, GPU usage), and deployment cost. To better reflect real-world applicability, we also conducted edge case deployment analysis, evaluating model performance on CPU only environments. Among the results, Qwen achieved the highest precision (0.54), while Sprinklr-Edge-OCR delivered the best overall F1 score (0.46) and outperformed others in efficiency, processing images 35 faster (0.17 seconds per image on average) and at less than 0.01 of the cost (0.006 USD per 1,000 images) compared to LVLM. Our findings demonstrate that the most optimal OCR systems for edge deployment are the traditional ones even in the era of LLMs due to their low compute requirements, low latency, and very high affordability.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes