When Smiley Turns Hostile: Interpreting How Emojis Trigger LLMs' Toxicity
This addresses a safety problem for users of LLMs in digital communication, highlighting a vulnerability that could lead to harmful outputs, though it is incremental as it builds on existing research on emoji understanding.
The paper investigates how emojis can trigger toxic content generation in large language models (LLMs), finding that prompts with emojis easily induce toxicity across 7 LLMs and 5 languages, and interprets this as emojis bypassing safety mechanisms through semantic channels.
Emojis are globally used non-verbal cues in digital communication, and extensive research has examined how large language models (LLMs) understand and utilize emojis across contexts. While usually associated with friendliness or playfulness, it is observed that emojis may trigger toxic content generation in LLMs. Motivated by such a observation, we aim to investigate: (1) whether emojis can clearly enhance the toxicity generation in LLMs and (2) how to interpret this phenomenon. We begin with a comprehensive exploration of emoji-triggered LLM toxicity generation by automating the construction of prompts with emojis to subtly express toxic intent. Experiments across 5 mainstream languages on 7 famous LLMs along with jailbreak tasks demonstrate that prompts with emojis could easily induce toxicity generation. To understand this phenomenon, we conduct model-level interpretations spanning semantic cognition, sequence generation and tokenization, suggesting that emojis can act as a heterogeneous semantic channel to bypass the safety mechanisms. To pursue deeper insights, we further probe the pre-training corpus and uncover potential correlation between the emoji-related data polution with the toxicity generation behaviors. Supplementary materials provide our implementation code and data. (Warning: This paper contains potentially sensitive contents)