AICLLGSep 21, 2025

seqBench: A Tunable Benchmark to Quantify Sequential Reasoning Limits of LLMs

arXiv:2509.16866v13 citationsh-index: 5EMNLP
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This provides a tunable benchmark for analyzing LLM reasoning failures, which is incremental but useful for researchers studying AI reasoning capabilities.

The researchers introduced seqBench, a parametrized benchmark to quantify sequential reasoning limits in LLMs by controlling logical depth, backtracking steps, and noise ratio, finding that accuracy collapses exponentially beyond model-specific logical depths and top models systematically fail despite minimal search complexity.

We introduce seqBench, a parametrized benchmark for probing sequential reasoning limits in Large Language Models (LLMs) through precise, multi-dimensional control over several key complexity dimensions. seqBench allows systematic variation of (1) the logical depth, defined as the number of sequential actions required to solve the task; (2) the number of backtracking steps along the optimal path, quantifying how often the agent must revisit prior states to satisfy deferred preconditions (e.g., retrieving a key after encountering a locked door); and (3) the noise ratio, defined as the ratio between supporting and distracting facts about the environment. Our evaluations on state-of-the-art LLMs reveal a universal failure pattern: accuracy collapses exponentially beyond a model-specific logical depth. Unlike existing benchmarks, seqBench's fine-grained control facilitates targeted analyses of these reasoning failures, illuminating universal scaling laws and statistical limits, as detailed in this paper alongside its generation methodology and evaluation metrics. We find that even top-performing models systematically fail on seqBench's structured reasoning tasks despite minimal search complexity, underscoring key limitations in their commonsense reasoning capabilities. Designed for future evolution to keep pace with advancing models, the seqBench datasets are publicly released to spur deeper scientific inquiry into LLM reasoning, aiming to establish a clearer understanding of their true potential and current boundaries for robust real-world application.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes