The Describe-Then-Generate Bottleneck: How VLM Descriptions Alter Image Generation Outcomes
This addresses a limitation in multimodal AI systems for creative workflows, providing empirical evidence of a measurable bottleneck, though it is incremental as it applies existing metrics to analyze a known issue.
The paper tackled the problem of information loss in vision-language-vision pipelines by quantifying degradation when visual content passes through textual intermediation, finding that 99.3% of samples showed substantial perceptual degradation and 91.5% demonstrated significant structural information loss.
With the increasing integration of multimodal AI systems in creative workflows, understanding information loss in vision-language-vision pipelines has become important for evaluating system limitations. However, the degradation that occurs when visual content passes through textual intermediation remains poorly quantified. In this work, we provide empirical analysis of the describe-then-generate bottleneck, where natural language serves as an intermediate representation for visual information. We generated 150 image pairs through the describe-then-generate pipeline and applied existing metrics (LPIPS, SSIM, and color distance) to measure information preservation across perceptual, structural, and chromatic dimensions. Our evaluation reveals that 99.3% of samples exhibit substantial perceptual degradation and 91.5% demonstrate significant structural information loss, providing empirical evidence that the describe-then-generate bottleneck represents a measurable and consistent limitation in contemporary multimodal systems.