Can You Trust Your Copilot? A Privacy Scorecard for AI Coding Assistants
This addresses privacy risks for developers and organizations using AI coding assistants, establishing a new benchmark for transparency in the AI industry.
The paper tackled the privacy and trust concerns of AI coding assistants by introducing a novel, expert-validated privacy scorecard, revealing a 20-point gap between the highest- and lowest-ranked tools and uncovering common weaknesses like opt-out consent for model training.
The rapid integration of AI-powered coding assistants into developer workflows has raised significant privacy and trust concerns. As developers entrust proprietary code to services like OpenAI's GPT, Google's Gemini, and GitHub Copilot, the unclear data handling practices of these tools create security and compliance risks. This paper addresses this challenge by introducing and applying a novel, expert-validated privacy scorecard. The methodology involves a detailed analysis of four document types; from legal policies to external audits; to score five leading assistants against 14 weighted criteria. A legal expert and a data protection officer refined these criteria and their weighting. The results reveal a distinct hierarchy of privacy protections, with a 20-point gap between the highest- and lowest-ranked tools. The analysis uncovers common industry weaknesses, including the pervasive use of opt-out consent for model training and a near-universal failure to filter secrets from user prompts proactively. The resulting scorecard provides actionable guidance for developers and organizations, enabling evidence-based tool selection. This work establishes a new benchmark for transparency and advocates for a shift towards more user-centric privacy standards in the AI industry.