CVOct 2, 2025

VirDA: Reusing Backbone for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Visual Reprogramming

arXiv:2510.01660v31 citationsTrans. Mach. Learn. Res.
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This reduces storage and computational costs for UDA by enabling backbone reuse across domains, though it is incremental as it builds on existing parameter-efficient methods.

The paper tackles the problem of parameter inefficiency in unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) by proposing VirDA, which uses visual reprogramming layers to adapt images to new domains without fine-tuning the backbone, achieving 92.8% mean accuracy on Office-31 with only 1.5M trainable parameters.

Existing UDA pipelines fine-tune already well-trained backbone parameters for every new source-and-target pair, resulting in the number of training parameters and storage memory growing linearly with each new pair, and also preventing the reuse of these well-trained backbone parameters. Inspired by recent implications that existing backbones have textural biases, we propose making use of domain-specific textural bias for domain adaptation via visual reprogramming, namely VirDA. Instead of fine-tuning the full backbone, VirDA prepends a domain-specific visual reprogramming layer to the backbone. This layer produces visual prompts that act as an added textural bias to the input image, adapting its "style" to a target domain. To optimize these visual reprogramming layers, we use multiple objective functions that optimize the intra- and inter-domain distribution differences when domain-adapting visual prompts are applied. This process does not require modifying the backbone parameters, allowing the same backbone to be reused across different domains. We evaluate VirDA on Office-31 and obtain 92.8% mean accuracy with only 1.5M trainable parameters. VirDA surpasses PDA, the state-of-the-art parameter-efficient UDA baseline, by +1.6% accuracy while using just 46% of its parameters. Compared with full-backbone fine-tuning, VirDA outperforms CDTrans and FixBi by +0.2% and +1.4%, respectively, while requiring only 1.7% and 2.8% of their trainable parameters. Relative to the strongest current methods (PMTrans and TVT), VirDA uses ~1.7% of their parameters and trades off only 2.2% and 1.1% accuracy, respectively.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes