SEAIOct 8, 2025

AISysRev -- LLM-based Tool for Title-abstract Screening

arXiv:2510.06708v11 citationsh-index: 11Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This tool helps researchers in software engineering by automating part of the screening process, though it is incremental as it builds on existing LLM capabilities.

The paper tackles the laborious task of title-abstract screening in systematic reviews by developing AiSysRev, an LLM-based tool that classifies papers into categories like Easy Includes and Boundary Excludes, with a trial on 137 papers showing it reduces human burden but requires intervention for error-prone cases.

Systematic reviews are a standard practice for summarizing the state of evidence in software engineering. Conducting systematic reviews is laborious, especially during the screening or study selection phase, where the number of papers can be overwhelming. During this phase, papers are assessed against inclusion and exclusion criteria based on their titles and abstracts. Recent research has demonstrated that large language models (LLMs) can perform title-abstract screening at a level comparable to that of a master's student. While LLMs cannot be fully trusted, they can help, for example, in Rapid Reviews, which try to expedite the review process. Building on recent research, we developed AiSysRev, an LLM-based screening tool implemented as a web application running in a Docker container. The tool accepts a CSV file containing paper titles and abstracts. Users specify inclusion and exclusion criteria. One can use multiple LLMs for screening via OpenRouter. AiSysRev supports both zero-shot and few-shot screening, and also allows for manual screening through interfaces that display LLM results as guidance for human reviewers.We conducted a trial study with 137 papers using the tool. Our findings indicate that papers can be classified into four categories: Easy Includes, Easy Excludes, Boundary Includes, and Boundary Excludes. The Boundary cases, where LLMs are prone to errors, highlight the need for human intervention. While LLMs do not replace human judgment in systematic reviews, they can significantly reduce the burden of assessing large volumes of scientific literature. Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVbEj4Y4tQI Tool: https://github.com/EvoTestOps/AISysRev

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes