AIOct 13, 2025

PaperArena: An Evaluation Benchmark for Tool-Augmented Agentic Reasoning on Scientific Literature

arXiv:2510.10909v310 citationsh-index: 17Has Code
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This addresses the problem of evaluating tool-augmented agents for scientific literature analysis, providing a standardized benchmark for researchers, but it is incremental as it builds on existing agent frameworks.

The authors tackled the lack of benchmarks for evaluating LLM-based agents in cross-paper scientific reasoning by introducing PaperArena, a benchmark requiring integration of information across multiple papers with external tools, where even advanced agents achieved only 38.78% average accuracy.

Understanding and reasoning on the web-scale scientific literature is a crucial touchstone for large language model (LLM) based agents designed to support complex knowledge-intensive tasks. However, existing works are mainly restricted to tool-free tasks within isolated papers, largely due to the lack of a benchmark for cross-paper reasoning and multi-tool orchestration in real research scenarios. In this work, we propose PaperArena, an evaluation benchmark for agents to address real-world research questions that typically require integrating information across multiple papers with the assistance of external tools. Given a research question, agents should integrate diverse formats across multiple papers through reasoning and interacting with appropriate tools, thereby producing a well-grounded answer. To support standardized evaluation, we provide a modular and extensible platform for agent execution, offering tools such as multimodal parsing, context retrieval, and programmatic computation. Experimental results reveal that even the most advanced LLM powering a well-established agent system achieves merely 38.78% average accuracy. On the hard subset, accuracy drops to only 18.47%, highlighting great potential for improvement. We also present several empirical findings, including that all agents tested exhibit inefficient tool usage, often invoking more tools than necessary to solve a task. We invite the community to adopt PaperArena to develop and evaluate more capable agents for scientific discovery. Our code and data are available https://github.com/Melmaphother/PaperArena.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes