MLDIS-NNITLGPRNov 2, 2025

Binary perceptron computational gap -- a parametric fl RDT view

arXiv:2511.01037v13 citationsh-index: 22
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses the algorithmic limitations in neural network storage memory for theoretical computer science and machine learning, but it is incremental as it builds on existing fl RDT methods to refine threshold estimates.

The paper tackles the statistical-computational gap in the asymmetric binary perceptron (ABP) by applying a parametric fully lifted random duality theory (fl RDT) to estimate algorithmic thresholds, finding that on the fifth level, the constraint density estimate converges to α ≈ 0.7764, which aligns with known clustering defragmentation ranges.

Recent studies suggest that asymmetric binary perceptron (ABP) likely exhibits the so-called statistical-computational gap characterized with the appearance of two phase transitioning constraint density thresholds: \textbf{\emph{(i)}} the \emph{satisfiability threshold} $α_c$, below/above which ABP succeeds/fails to operate as a storage memory; and \textbf{\emph{(ii)}} \emph{algorithmic threshold} $α_a$, below/above which one can/cannot efficiently determine ABP's weight so that it operates as a storage memory. We consider a particular parametric utilization of \emph{fully lifted random duality theory} (fl RDT) [85] and study its potential ABP's algorithmic implications. A remarkable structural parametric change is uncovered as one progresses through fl RDT lifting levels. On the first two levels, the so-called $\c$ sequence -- a key parametric fl RDT component -- is of the (natural) decreasing type. A change of such phenomenology on higher levels is then connected to the $α_c$ -- $α_a$ threshold change. Namely, on the second level concrete numerical values give for the critical constraint density $α=α_c\approx 0.8331$. While progressing through higher levels decreases this estimate, already on the fifth level we observe a satisfactory level of convergence and obtain $α\approx 0.7764$. This allows to draw two striking parallels: \textbf{\emph{(i)}} the obtained constraint density estimate is in a remarkable agrement with range $α\in (0.77,0.78)$ of clustering defragmentation (believed to be responsible for failure of locally improving algorithms) [17,88]; and \textbf{\emph{(ii)}} the observed change of $\c$ sequence phenomenology closely matches the one of the negative Hopfield model for which the existence of efficient algorithms that closely approach similar type of threshold has been demonstrated recently [87].

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes