CVNov 6, 2025

Evaluating the Impact of Weather-Induced Sensor Occlusion on BEVFusion for 3D Object Detection

arXiv:2511.04347v11 citationsh-index: 13ICVES
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of sensor reliability for automated vehicles under adverse weather conditions, but it is incremental as it evaluates an existing method on new data without proposing novel solutions.

The paper investigated how weather-induced sensor occlusions affect 3D object detection accuracy using the BEVFusion architecture on the nuScenes dataset, finding that camera-only detection drops by 41.3% in mAP under moderate occlusion, while fused settings show a minor 4.1% drop when the camera is occluded but a larger 26.8% drop when LiDAR is occluded.

Accurate 3D object detection is essential for automated vehicles to navigate safely in complex real-world environments. Bird's Eye View (BEV) representations, which project multi-sensor data into a top-down spatial format, have emerged as a powerful approach for robust perception. Although BEV-based fusion architectures have demonstrated strong performance through multimodal integration, the effects of sensor occlusions, caused by environmental conditions such as fog, haze, or physical obstructions, on 3D detection accuracy remain underexplored. In this work, we investigate the impact of occlusions on both camera and Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) outputs using the BEVFusion architecture, evaluated on the nuScenes dataset. Detection performance is measured using mean Average Precision (mAP) and the nuScenes Detection Score (NDS). Our results show that moderate camera occlusions lead to a 41.3% drop in mAP (from 35.6% to 20.9%) when detection is based only on the camera. On the other hand, LiDAR sharply drops in performance only under heavy occlusion, with mAP falling by 47.3% (from 64.7% to 34.1%), with a severe impact on long-range detection. In fused settings, the effect depends on which sensor is occluded: occluding the camera leads to a minor 4.1% drop (from 68.5% to 65.7%), while occluding LiDAR results in a larger 26.8% drop (to 50.1%), revealing the model's stronger reliance on LiDAR for the task of 3D object detection. Our results highlight the need for future research into occlusion-aware evaluation methods and improved sensor fusion techniques that can maintain detection accuracy in the presence of partial sensor failure or degradation due to adverse environmental conditions.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes