Cogent argument extensions are weakly admissible but not vice versa
arXiv:2511.09600v11 citations
Originality Synthesis-oriented
AI Analysis
This clarifies theoretical properties for researchers in formal argumentation, but it is incremental as it builds on existing semantics.
The paper tackled the relationship between cogent and weakly admissible semantics in argumentation frameworks, proving that cogent extensions are weakly admissible but the converse does not hold.
In this research note, we show the relationship between two non-admissible argumentation framework semantics: cogent and weakly admissible semantics. We prove that, while cogent extensions are weakly admissible, the converse is not true.