LGSPNov 20, 2025

L-JacobiNet and S-JacobiNet: An Analysis of Adaptive Generalization, Stabilization, and Spectral Domain Trade-offs in GNNs

arXiv:2511.16081v12 citationsh-index: 3
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses heterophily and over-smoothing in graph neural networks for researchers, but it is incremental as it builds on existing spectral GNN methods.

The paper tackled the limitations of spectral GNNs like ChebyNet by introducing L-JacobiNet and S-JacobiNet, revealing that ChebyNet's main flaw is stabilization rather than its static nature, with S-JacobiNet outperforming L-JacobiNet on 4 out of 5 benchmark datasets.

Spectral GNNs, like ChebyNet, are limited by heterophily and over-smoothing due to their static, low-pass filter design. This work investigates the "Adaptive Orthogonal Polynomial Filter" (AOPF) class as a solution. We introduce two models operating in the [-1, 1] domain: 1) `L-JacobiNet`, the adaptive generalization of `ChebyNet` with learnable alpha, beta shape parameters, and 2) `S-JacobiNet`, a novel baseline representing a LayerNorm-stabilized static `ChebyNet`. Our analysis, comparing these models against AOPFs in the [0, infty) domain (e.g., `LaguerreNet`), reveals critical, previously unknown trade-offs. We find that the [0, infty) domain is superior for modeling heterophily, while the [-1, 1] domain (Jacobi) provides superior numerical stability at high K (K>20). Most significantly, we discover that `ChebyNet`'s main flaw is stabilization, not its static nature. Our static `S-JacobiNet` (ChebyNet+LayerNorm) outperforms the adaptive `L-JacobiNet` on 4 out of 5 benchmark datasets, identifying `S-JacobiNet` as a powerful, overlooked baseline and suggesting that adaptation in the [-1, 1] domain can lead to overfitting.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes