CVAIDec 5, 2025

Probing the effectiveness of World Models for Spatial Reasoning through Test-time Scaling

arXiv:2512.05809v1Has Code
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work addresses limitations in spatial reasoning for vision-language models, offering insights into verification methods but highlighting incremental improvements with persistent challenges.

The paper systematically evaluates test-time verifiers for world models in spatial reasoning tasks, finding that existing verifiers like MindJourney's provide poor calibration and are biased, while their proposed ViSA framework improves performance on the SAT-Real benchmark but fails on the challenging MMSI-Bench, indicating world models as a bottleneck.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) remain limited in spatial reasoning tasks that require multi-view understanding and embodied perspective shifts. Recent approaches such as MindJourney attempt to mitigate this gap through test-time scaling where a world model imagines action-conditioned trajectories and a heuristic verifier selects helpful views from such trajectories. In this work, we systematically examine how such test-time verifiers behave across benchmarks, uncovering both their promise and their pitfalls. Our uncertainty-based analyses show that MindJourney's verifier provides little meaningful calibration, and that random scoring often reduces answer entropy equally well, thus exposing systematic action biases and unreliable reward signals. To mitigate these, we introduce a Verification through Spatial Assertions (ViSA) framework that grounds the test-time reward in verifiable, frame-anchored micro-claims. This principled verifier consistently improves spatial reasoning on the SAT-Real benchmark and corrects trajectory-selection biases through more balanced exploratory behavior. However, on the challenging MMSI-Bench, none of the verifiers, including ours, achieve consistent scaling, suggesting that the current world models form an information bottleneck where imagined views fail to enrich fine-grained reasoning. Together, these findings chart the bad, good, and ugly aspects of test-time verification for world-model-based reasoning. Our code is available at https://github.com/chandar-lab/visa-for-mindjourney.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes