AICLJan 8

Observations and Remedies for Large Language Model Bias in Self-Consuming Performative Loop

arXiv:2601.05184v1h-index: 7
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses bias issues in LLMs for users affected by performative feedback loops, but it is incremental as it builds on existing concerns about synthetic data and bias.

The study tackles the problem of bias amplification in large language models (LLMs) due to self-consuming retraining loops with synthetic data, finding that these loops increase preference bias and decrease disparate bias in experiments on three real-world tasks, and proposes a reward-based rejection sampling strategy to mitigate the bias.

The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has led to growing interest in using synthetic data to train future models. However, this creates a self-consuming retraining loop, where models are trained on their own outputs and may cause performance drops and induce emerging biases. In real-world applications, previously deployed LLMs may influence the data they generate, leading to a dynamic system driven by user feedback. For example, if a model continues to underserve users from a group, less query data will be collected from this particular demographic of users. In this study, we introduce the concept of \textbf{S}elf-\textbf{C}onsuming \textbf{P}erformative \textbf{L}oop (\textbf{SCPL}) and investigate the role of synthetic data in shaping bias during these dynamic iterative training processes under controlled performative feedback. This controlled setting is motivated by the inaccessibility of real-world user preference data from dynamic production systems, and enables us to isolate and analyze feedback-driven bias evolution in a principled manner. We focus on two types of loops, including the typical retraining setting and the incremental fine-tuning setting, which is largely underexplored. Through experiments on three real-world tasks, we find that the performative loop increases preference bias and decreases disparate bias. We design a reward-based rejection sampling strategy to mitigate the bias, moving towards more trustworthy self-improving systems.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes