LGJan 9

Falsifying Sparse Autoencoder Reasoning Features in Language Models

arXiv:2601.05679v64 citationsh-index: 3Has Code
AI Analysis

This work addresses the problem of interpreting internal model features for researchers, highlighting that current methods may be incremental and require falsification to avoid misattribution.

The study investigated whether sparse autoencoders reliably identify reasoning-related features in language models, finding that 45%-90% of candidate features were sensitive to token-level interventions and could be activated by injecting a few associated tokens into non-reasoning text.

We study how reliably sparse autoencoders (SAEs) support claims about reasoning-related internal features in large language models. We first give a stylized analysis showing that sparsity-regularized decoding can preferentially retain stable low-dimensional correlates while suppressing high-dimensional within-behavior variation, motivating the possibility that contrastively selected "reasoning" features may concentrate on cue-like structure when such cues are coupled with reasoning traces. Building on this perspective, we propose a falsification-based evaluation framework that combines causal token injection with LLM-guided counterexample construction. Across 22 configurations spanning multiple model families, layers, and reasoning datasets, we find that many contrastively selected candidates are highly sensitive to token-level interventions, with 45%-90% activating after injecting only a few associated tokens into non-reasoning text. For the remaining context-dependent candidates, LLM-guided falsification produces targeted non-reasoning inputs that trigger activation and meaning-preserving paraphrases of top-activating reasoning traces that suppress it. A small steering study yields minimal changes on the evaluated benchmarks. Overall, our results suggest that, in the settings we study, sparse decompositions can favor low-dimensional correlates that co-occur with reasoning, underscoring the need for falsification when attributing high-level behaviors to individual SAE features. Code is available at https://github.com/GeorgeMLP/reasoning-probing.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes