CLJan 22

Common to Whom? Regional Cultural Commonsense and LLM Bias in India

arXiv:2601.15550v2h-index: 13
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This addresses the issue of cultural bias in LLMs for users in culturally heterogeneous nations like India, providing a generalizable framework for evaluation, though it is incremental in extending existing benchmarks to regional levels.

The paper tackled the problem of assuming uniform cultural commonsense within nations by introducing Indica, a benchmark for India, and found that only 39.4% of questions had agreement across five regions, showing cultural commonsense is predominantly regional. It evaluated eight LLMs, revealing low accuracy (13.4%-20.9%) on region-specific questions and geographic bias, with models over-selecting Central and North India by 30-40%.

Existing cultural commonsense benchmarks treat nations as monolithic, assuming uniform practices within national boundaries. But does cultural commonsense hold uniformly within a nation, or does it vary at the sub-national level? We introduce Indica, the first benchmark designed to test LLMs' ability to address this question, focusing on India - a nation of 28 states, 8 union territories, and 22 official languages. We collect human-annotated answers from five Indian regions (North, South, East, West, and Central) across 515 questions spanning 8 domains of everyday life, yielding 1,630 region-specific question-answer pairs. Strikingly, only 39.4% of questions elicit agreement across all five regions, demonstrating that cultural commonsense in India is predominantly regional, not national. We evaluate eight state-of-the-art LLMs and find two critical gaps: models achieve only 13.4%-20.9% accuracy on region-specific questions, and they exhibit geographic bias, over-selecting Central and North India as the "default" (selected 30-40% more often than expected) while under-representing East and West. Beyond India, our methodology provides a generalizable framework for evaluating cultural commonsense in any culturally heterogeneous nation, from question design grounded in anthropological taxonomy, to regional data collection, to bias measurement.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes