CogToM: A Comprehensive Theory of Mind Benchmark inspired by Human Cognition for Large Language Models
This addresses the need for a more robust benchmark to evaluate human-like cognitive abilities in LLMs, though it is incremental as it builds on existing ToM assessment frameworks.
The authors tackled the problem of assessing Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) by introducing CogToM, a comprehensive benchmark with over 8000 bilingual instances across 46 paradigms, and found significant performance heterogeneities and persistent bottlenecks in 22 models, including GPT-5.1 and Qwen3-Max.
Whether Large Language Models (LLMs) truly possess human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) capabilities has garnered increasing attention. However, existing benchmarks remain largely restricted to narrow paradigms like false belief tasks, failing to capture the full spectrum of human cognitive mechanisms. We introduce CogToM, a comprehensive, theoretically grounded benchmark comprising over 8000 bilingual instances across 46 paradigms, validated by 49 human annotator.A systematic evaluation of 22 representative models, including frontier models like GPT-5.1 and Qwen3-Max, reveals significant performance heterogeneities and highlights persistent bottlenecks in specific dimensions. Further analysis based on human cognitive patterns suggests potential divergences between LLM and human cognitive structures. CogToM offers a robust instrument and perspective for investigating the evolving cognitive boundaries of LLMs.