LGCRMLJan 29

Sampling-Free Privacy Accounting for Matrix Mechanisms under Random Allocation

arXiv:2601.21636v22 citationsh-index: 7
Originality Incremental advance
AI Analysis

This work provides improved privacy accounting for differentially private machine learning, addressing a specific bottleneck in matrix mechanisms for researchers and practitioners, though it is incremental as it builds on existing methods.

The paper tackles the problem of privacy amplification for differentially private model training with matrix mechanisms under random allocation, developing sampling-free bounds based on Rényi divergence and conditional composition that avoid the limitations of prior sampling-based methods, such as probabilistic guarantees or high sample requirements, and demonstrating efficacy across various matrix mechanisms.

We study privacy amplification for differentially private model training with matrix factorization under random allocation (also known as the balls-in-bins model). Recent work by Choquette-Choo et al. (2025) proposes a sampling-based Monte Carlo approach to compute amplification parameters in this setting. However, their guarantees either only hold with some high probability or require random abstention by the mechanism. Furthermore, the required number of samples for ensuring $(ε,δ)$-DP is inversely proportional to $δ$. In contrast, we develop sampling-free bounds based on Rényi divergence and conditional composition. The former is facilitated by a dynamic programming formulation to efficiently compute the bounds. The latter complements it by offering stronger privacy guarantees for small $ε$, where Rényi divergence bounds inherently lead to an over-approximation. Our framework applies to arbitrary banded and non-banded matrices. Through numerical comparisons, we demonstrate the efficacy of our approach across a broad range of matrix mechanisms used in research and practice.

Foundations

The foundational work for this paper's niche, ranked by how specifically the neighbourhood builds on it — not by global fame.

Your Notes